Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 15:04

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Procter & Gamble to Cut 7,000 Jobs - WSJ
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Skyrim fans baffled after finding huge gold hoard we’ve never seen before - GAMINGbible
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Which is the first MV you watched in Stray Kids?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
ESA supports Moon mission carrying first European rover - European Space Agency
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
35 Father's Day Gifts To Just Give Yourself - BuzzFeed
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?